NSWALC RESPONDS TO INVESTIGATOR
The New South Wales Aboriginal Land Council has lodged its formal response
to the report of a Government-appointed investigator which has recommended
the duly elected 13-member council be sacked and replaced with an administrator.
NSWALC's response was delivered to the Minister for Aboriginal Affairs,
Dr. Andrew Refshauge, at a meeting today with NSWALC Chairperson, Mr.
Les Trindall, and the Council's Chief Executive Officer, Mr William Johnstone.
Council has requested the Minister table its response in State Parliament
to ensure informed parliamentary and public debate on both documents given
their importance to the future of the land rights system in New South
Wales.
The report of the investigator was tabled in Parliament by Doctor Refshauge
on September 16.
Mr Trindall made it clear today that NSWALC would accept many of the
procedural recommendations contained in the investigator's report. It
had already introduced many of the recommended measures in a comprehensive
and ongoing process of internal reform.
NSWALC, however, categorically rejected the principal recommendation
that the duly elected councillors be sacked and replaced with an administrator
for 18 months.
"The substantial majority of NSWALC's councillors and our new CEO,
William Johnstone, are totally united in their opposition to this recommendation,"
he said.
"We have presented the Minister with a well considered alternative
which will preserve our hard won rights, and those of our constituents
under the Act, and provide a new and improved regime of transparency and
accountability," he added.
"This would be a far more effective formula for enduring reform
of NSWALC's culture and structures than that proposed by the investigator."
Mr Trindall said NSWALC's reform process included:
· A comprehensive review of its present policies, procedures and
practices in all areas of activity and administration.
· The development and adoption of new governance policies and
procedures.
· The development of a new Code of Conduct in collaboration with
the Registrar and the revision of NSWALC's Model Rules.
· The appointment of a new CEO under terms which reflect the separation
of powers and functions now embedded in legislation
· A renewed commitment on behalf of all councillors to addressing
issues affecting NSWALC's effectiveness and efficiency.
Mr Trindall said the Council of NSWALC had already demonstrated its commitment
to the process.
"Amongst other things, we have developed, and unanimously adopted,
a range of key policies and procedures on corporate governance and decision
making, and in relation to our functions in respect of Local and Regional
Aboriginal Land Councils," he said.
"Copies of these policies and procedures have been with the Minister
since early September," he added.
"The Council is working with its administrative arm, through the
CEO, to implement these."
Mr Trindall said NSWALC had also provided a written undertaking to the
Minister that the CEO could provide him with an independent monthly report
on Council's adherence to its new policies and procedures.
"We have also advised the Minister we will approach the Auditor
General to arrange the secondment, at NSWALC's expense, of an independent
probity officer to monitor the continuation of the reform process,"
he said
"This officer would report monthly to the Minister, the Auditor
General and the Council of NSWALC. We have also proposed a range of other
checks and balances in our undertaking."
Mr Trindall said NSWALC did not intend to publicly release its formal
response at this time "but we do wish to place on the public record
a number of key points."
"NSWALC is prepared to accept fair criticism and does accept the
need for changes to its policies and practices on corporate governance,"
he said.
"This is a fact clearly acknowledged in our response together with
details of the reform process and the written undertaking which we have
provided to the Minister," he added.
"However, we want to make it abundantly clear that we can find no
evidence, argument or analysis in the investigator's report to justify
his key recommendation that an administrator be appointed for 18 months
to take over all of the functions of the duly-elected Council.
"The investigator has also advanced no argument or rationale at
all in favour of the administrator being appointed in relation to all
of NSWALC's functions.
"An 'all functions' administration may be justified where an organisation
is incapable of effectively administering its functions.
"The investigator has presented no evidence in his report that this
is the case with NSWALC. He does not attempt to justify his primary recommendation
on that ground.
"The investigator's reports shows no appreciation of our land rights
legislation and contains, at best, a superficial exploration of the facts
on a number of substantive issues."
Mr Trindall said the investigator had noted briefly in his "Summary
of Key Recommendations" that the appointment of an Administrator
would result in the removal of duly elected councillors.
"NSWALC finds it extraordinary that this theme is discussed nowhere
in the substantial body of the report," he said.
"The representative nature of Aboriginal land councils and the extensive
provisions in relation to voting rights and elections is a central aspect
of the administrative regime established by the Act.
"The removal of the elected representatives is antithetical to one
of the clear purposes of the Act.
"NSWALC has respectfully suggested the Minister should not take
this step without being entirely satisfied no other course of action is
open to him to secure the proper performance of NSWALC's functions. There
is no evidence, argument or analysis in the investigator's report which
leads to that conclusion.
"The extent to which this matter has been considered by the investigator
is indicated by the recommendation that an Aboriginal person be appointed
as the Administrator.
"This suggestion is, frankly, insulting to the electors.
"It strongly suggests a lack of appreciation of the importance of
the representational nature of the constitution of land councils in New
South Wales."
Mr Trindall said the superficiality of the investigator's inquiry was
also displayed in the fact that the Minister would be acting ultra vires
if he followed the primary recommendation.
He pointed out that sub section 226 (2) of the Act provides that where
an administrator is appointed to all of NSWALC's functions, all councillors
are removed from office.
Clause 99 of the regulation requires that the election of a new council
take place on a date to be determined by the Minister, in consultation
with his or her appointee, but that election must occur "no later
than 12 months after the appointment of an administrator."
Mr Trindall said a close examination of the report showed the principal
recommendation was based largely on what the investigator perceived to
be an inadequate or inappropriate separation of powers between Council
and its body corporate (CEO and staff).
"This is incorrect," he said.
"At one stage in the report the investigator claims the CEO will
struggle to direct the body corporate and implement the required changes.
This is a mere assertion.
"There is no evidence to support it, no argument is developed, yet
the investigator's principal recommendation relies heavily upon it."
"An administrator is required, he says, 'to enable the CEO, without
interference of Council, time to establish a strong culture of professional
management and integrity.'
"Mr Johnstone was well aware of the investigation and the challenges
that are ahead of the organisation when he took the job on.
"He does not agree with the assessment made by the investigator
about the need to shelter him from interference by Council.
"The combination of Council and a new, well qualified and enthusiastic
CEO, operating under a new and more clearly defined constitutional framework,
is far more likely to be an effective formula for enduring reform of NSWALC's
culture and structures than that proposed by the investigator."
Copyright © 2007-2010 NSWALC
|